Current:Home > NewsJudge nixes bid to restrict Trump statements that could endanger officers in classified records case -Secure Growth Academy
Judge nixes bid to restrict Trump statements that could endanger officers in classified records case
View
Date:2025-04-16 02:43:05
WASHINGTON (AP) — The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s classified documents case in Florida on Tuesday denied prosecutors’ request to bar the former president from making public statements that could endanger law enforcement agents participating in the prosecution.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon said in her order that prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team didn’t give defense lawyers adequate time to discuss the request before it was filed Friday evening. She denied the request without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could file it again.
The request followed a distorted claim by Trump last week that the FBI agents who searched his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022 were “authorized to shoot me” and were “locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger.”
The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was referring to the disclosure in a court document that the FBI, during the search in Palm Beach, Florida, followed a standard use-of-force policy that prohibits the use of deadly force except when the officer conducting the search has a reasonable belief that the “subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.”
Prosecutors said in court papers late Friday that Trump’s statements falsely suggesting that federal agents “were complicit in a plot to assassinate him” expose law enforcement officers — some of whom prosecutors noted will be called as witnesses at his trial — “to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment.”
Defense attorneys in a court filing late Monday called prosecutors’ proposed restriction on Trump’s speech “unconstitutional” and noted that the names of law enforcement officers in the case are subject to a protective order preventing their public release. Defense attorneys said they asked Smith’s team on Friday if the two sides could meet on Monday before prosecutors submit their request to give the defense time to discuss it with Trump. They called prosecutors’ decision to file the motion Friday night “bad-faith behavior, plain and simple.”
Trump faces dozens of felony counts accusing him of illegally hoarding at his Mar-a-Lago estate classified documents that he took with him after he left the White House in 2021 and then obstructing the FBI’s efforts to get them back. He has pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing.
It’s among four criminal cases Trump is confronting as he seeks to reclaim the White House, but outside of the ongoing New York hush money prosecution, it’s unclear that any of the other three will reach trial before the November election. The decision came as defense lawyers were delivering their closing arguments in the hush money case.
Trump has already had restrictions placed on his speech in two of the other cases over incendiary comments officials say threaten the integrity of the prosecutions.
In the New York case, Trump has been fined and threatened with jail time for repeatedly violating a gag order that bars him from making public statements about witnesses, jurors and some others connected to the matter.
veryGood! (138)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2023: The Icons' Guide to the Best Early Access Deals
- China imposes export controls on 2 metals used in semiconductors and solar panels
- Nikki Bella Shares Her Relatable AF Take on Parenting a Toddler
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- The US Forest Service Planned to Increase Burning to Prevent Wildfires. Will a Pause on Prescribed Fire Instead Bring More Delays?
- Denver psychedelics conference attracts thousands
- Lung Cancer in Nonsmokers? Study Identifies Air Pollution as a Trigger
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- California Just Banned Gas-Powered Cars. Here’s Everything You Need to Know
Ranking
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Western tribes' last-ditch effort to stall a large lithium mine in Nevada
- On The Global Stage, Jacinda Ardern Was a Climate Champion, But Victories Were Hard to Come by at Home
- The streaming model is cratering — here's how that's hurting actors, writers and fans
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Legacy admissions, the Russian Ruble and Final Fantasy XVI
- The Pathway to 90% Clean Electricity Is Mostly Clear. The Last 10%, Not So Much
- Why inflation is losing its punch — and why things could get even better
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
The Sweet Way Cardi B and Offset Are Celebrating Daughter Kulture's 5th Birthday
Environmentalists Fear a Massive New Plastics Plant Near Pittsburgh Will Worsen Pollution and Stimulate Fracking
Save Up to $250 on Dyson Hair Tools, Vacuums, and Air Purifiers During Amazon Prime Day 2023
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
The Bachelorette's Tayshia Adams Deserves the Final Rose for Deal Hunting With Her Prime Day Picks
TikTok Just Became a Go-To Source for Real-Time Videos of Hurricane Ian
Activists Are Suing Texas Over Its Plan to Expand Interstate 35, Saying the Project Is Bad for Environmental Justice and the Climate